An Executive Director's point of view


January 30, 2018: Free speech vs hateful speech

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
The Ontario Roads Association was concerned about "intolerant" social media statements posted by one of its Board members.

Although those statements fell short of Canada's prohibition against hateful speech, the organization's leaders felt that a person who promoted those beliefs should not sit on its Board.

Well, suppose all but one of the members of a Board voiced strongly held positions about issues that might be categorized as racist, sexist, ageist, or disparaging to people of particular religions, nationalities, ethnic groups, or sexual persuasions.

And what if that lone Board member posted comments on a personal social media page (not the association's page) that were in conflict with the beliefs of the rest of the Board?

Would it be permissible to ban the dissenting member from serving on the Board?

When judging a member's suitability to sit on a Board of Directors, be very careful how you make that decision. Establish a formal policy, don't just respond to "mob action," and don't just pay attention to the hot issues of the day.

Be sure you are setting legitimate criteria and not guidelines that will simply attract people who are likely to go along with what everybody else thinks.

July 13, 2017: I've heard that before

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
New Board members will sometimes raise issues that have already been discussed and resolved.

Still, don't be too quick to cut them off. They may not have known of the earlier exchange, the nature of the subject matter may have changed, and it may be a good idea to revisit the issue.

Before brushing aside something you think is repetitious and a waste of everybody's time, consider if renewed discourse could actually be useful.

July 04, 2017: Young Board members

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
You may find that turnover is higher among your association's younger Board members than among the older ones.

Don't let that hinder your efforts to maintain age diversity. Young Board members may still be putting their lives in order. They have other irons in the fire.

At one association, two young Board members won company promotions that required them to relocate overseas. The spouse of another was in the same situation and the couple moved away. Yet another returned to college to earn an MBA.

They weren't unhappy or dissatisfied. They didn't feel ignored. In fact, they were integral parts of the Board's governing process.

They simply had other concerns to tend to.

So, keep recruiting young Board members and don't worry about them staying only a short time. They may contribute significantly to organizational decision-making while they are here.

April 20, 2017: Board pre-orientation

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
Let members know what Board service entails before they declare their candidacies.

You can conduct a Board of Directors pre-orientation for all members as part of the "Call for Nominations," so they can become familiar with the duties and responsibilities of Board service before deciding whether or not to vie for a Board position.

Waiting until they've been elected may be too late.

February 06, 2017: Board recruitment fail

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
I received a form letter from somebody I don't know inviting me to serve on the Board of a newly formed organization.

I declined.

If this had been a bona fide organization assembling its Board of Directors, I would have been contacted in a more personal manner and the reasons for my selection would have been specific to my background.

The organization that contacted me appeared to be trying to establish legitimacy. To me, it flunked the smell test.

When soliciting somebody for a leadership position in your organization, it's OK to send an initial email. But it should not contain the "sell."

The email message should be swiftly followed by a telephone call and nominees told who suggested them and why it was felt they were suited for leadership of the group.

They need to be told how they can make a meaningful contribution to the work of the organization.

Don't expect people to succumb to the flattery of having been asked to sit on a Board. Those who do will probably be lousy Board members.

And they'll simply be helping your group look more legit (which is maybe all you want, anyway).

November 21, 2016: Self-nominations

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
Many organizations look down on self-nominated Board candidates. They are often viewed as unqualified applicants who offer themselves because nobody else will recommend them. They are frequently the last choice, if a choice at all, of nominating committees.

However, quite a few trade and professional organizations rate self-nominated candidates as their top choices. They often feel those folks possess the drive and ambition to serve the organization well.

So, in many groups, a "Call for Nominations" may generate a full complement of Board candidates, mostly self-nominated, and the job of the nominating committee will be vetting the prospects, not searching for them.
Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
I've always felt that the CEO should NOT be a member of the Board of Directors and should certainly NOT vote on Board matters.

The CEO is a "hired gun," and no matter how much authority that person holds or how much deference is given that person by Board members, s/he is still simply a resource and should not be a formal part of the decision-making process of the association.

But there are two instances in which it would actually be helpful for the CEO to serve as an ex officio (no voting privileges) Board member:

1. When talking to the IRS and it insists on speaking only with a member of the Board.

2. When the Board meets in Executive session (which should be a rare occurrence). The Board should only meet without the CEO when evaluating that person. So, being an ex-officio Board member means the CEO cannot be excluded from the meeting. (If the Board wants to conduct business without the CEO present, there is probably a problem in their relationship that needs to be quickly remedied).

So, it may not be such a bad idea for the CEO to be a Board member.

November 06, 2015: Meeting schedules

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
It's best to set annual Board and committee meeting schedules at the beginning of the year. Participants can then clear their calendars ahead of time and are more likely to avoid conflicts.

And don't change the meeting schedule because of candidate debates, sporting events, or other activities that have little or nothing to do with your association - even if those activities interest your Board or Committee members.

If you schedule on a meeting-by-meeting basis, people will always have conflicts - work and otherwise - and may expect the groups to accommodate their needs.

Don't do that. Agree to a schedule ahead of time and stick to it. Folks will make a greater effort to participate and attendance is likely to be better.

August 05, 2015: Board member freebies

Category: Governance
Posted by: David M Patt
A prospective Board member wanted to know if his membership fee would be waived if he was elected. He wanted to know if he would be granted free registration to the annual conference and if his travel and lodging expenses would be paid by the association.

The answer to all of those questions was "no."

Board membership, he was told, was a service, not an honor, and there weren't any perks.

He accepted the nomination anyway. Hopefully, he'll serve the organization well and won't ask again about perks.

Archives to previous blog entries


buy viagra generic cialis Angel