An Executive Director's point of view
April 27, 2015: Publishing mistakes
April 17, 2015: Write good
"Officials say a suspect seen beating a man with four others hit a 23-year-old Columbus police officer with a vehicle Wednesday near Matilda Lane Apartments."
Did this person use the four others to beat the man?
Lesson learned: If an association displays poor writing in its published works, many people will assume the same, low level of professional expertise exists in the group's other programs.
December 24, 2014: Misinformation
Solicit the same info from more than one person and review documents that were written at that time. Individuals often remember events differently, and they don't always recall facts correctly - even when they were involved in the reported activity.
Once you publish something, it will be cited countless times in the future and be treated as an accurate accounting of what occurred.
So, get it right.
July 17, 2014: Do fonts matter?
Read about it here - and don't miss the part about the "gutter test."
July 15, 2014: Read it before you print it
That is not a minor error. It shows that the writer didn't know the proper term and that nobody checked what had been written.
Before you publish anything - a blog comment, email message, newsletter article, etc. - proofread it and make sure the words are used correctly and that spelling and grammar are correct.
September 02, 2013: Advertising snafu
A recreational facility ran a full page, four-color ad in the magazine of a metropolitan daily, and included pictures of six events it would be hosting in the coming months.
The ad displayed the name of the facility, but not its address nor the town in which it was located. The telephone number did not include the area code, despite there being six area codes in the metro area in which the publication circulated.
The web address did appear, but that's not enough. Other information should still be complete and correct.
I wonder if anybody proofed the ad before it was published.
June 04, 2013: Who writes for association publications?
But is that always the best practice?
Many members are poor writers and must be heavily edited. Others have difficulty meeting deadlines. Some submit already written articles that may not fit the editorial schedule of the publication.
Quite a few editorialize instead of report.
Sometimes, associations establish general themes and select volunteers to identify specific topics within those themes for articles. Those volunteers may also recruit people to write the articles.
But volunteers often choose topics because they want to write about them. Or, they recruit experts who state their views without reporting the opinions of practitioners. Those comments may be suitable for sidebars but aren't always appropriate for complete articles.
It may be better for associations to recruit a pool of volunteers who can be given assignments and will write what they are told to write about.
Volunteers can be chosen because of their writing abilities and can be tested on small articles. If they write well, report well, and meet deadlines, they can be assigned feature articles or even be given regular columns.
Publishing quality content may be more important than showcasing members.
May 07, 2013: Font wars
Check it out.
April 29, 2013: Deceptive subject lines
Don't imply something that turns out not to be true.
But don't be so bland that your messages are deleted without being opened.
Here are some tips for selecting the proper subject line to get people to open your emails.
April 24, 2013: Get the facts right
In its obsession to report alleged "news" about the Boston Marathon bombings, the New York Post published incorrect information and even posted pictures of "suspects" who had nothing to do with the attack.
Other media reported inaccuracies, as well.
Don't do that in association publications. It's better to publish nothing at all than to publish what is not true.